🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is causing them avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving overseas. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families want more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to continue for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the right answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.